On Tuesday 08 September 2020 01:40:52 Gregg Eshelman via Emc-users wrote:

> Why such a thin layer height? 0.2mm would print faster. 0.3mm prints
> even faster and can be stronger due to thicker layers and a whole
> bunch fewer layer to layer bonds. Of course the surface finish is
> rougher but at least for experimenting it would make the test models
> much quicker to print.
>
True, but the dimensions change, AND I want the spline mating surfaces as 
smooth as possible so a light coat of coconut cooking oil can lube it 
for quite a while. And because of the extruders flow limits, a taller 
layer wouldn't gain much time as you'd still have to slow down to allow 
the extruder to keep up with PETG.  Time to bond before cooling was 
improved quite a bit by slowing the side fan to an idle speed, I just 
made the best bearing carrier I've made yet by essentially turning it 
off. And I'm ploting how to fix a baffle on top of the hot block to keep 
the front fans cooling air away from the hot block.  Those hot ends that 
have the fan clipped onto the heat sink look like a better idea. Still 
looking for a 2 bolt mount that does that.

>     On Monday, September 7, 2020, 5:58:13 PM MDT, Gene Heskett
> <ghesk...@shentel.net> wrote: When making stuff out of plastic in a
> printer, its laid up a layer at a time. In this case the layers are
> .12mm thick.  Thats quite a bunch of layers if the part is 40mm tall.
> _______________________________________________
> Emc-users mailing list
> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Cheers, Gene Heskett
-- 
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
If we desire respect for the law, we must first make the law respectable.
 - Louis D. Brandeis
Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene>


_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to