"Define a set of hardware that works and make their own distribution with only one user interface. It doesn't surprise me that nobody wants to do this thankless task."
Perhaps thankless but Tormach has built a presumably profitable business by doing exactly that. And then packaging and selling the hardware to match. An added dimension many (me included) do not want to tackle. Overall, I am very impressed (and satisfied) with the capability and progress. thanks Stuart On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 9:33 AM <ken.stra...@sympatico.ca> wrote: > "Define a set of hardware that works and make their own distribution with > only one user interface. It doesn't surprise me that nobody wants to do > this thankless task." > > Perhaps thankless but Tormach has built a presumably profitable business by > doing exactly that. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Eric Keller <keller...@gmail.com> > Sent: January 26, 2023 10:01 AM > To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC) <emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net> > Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Running PathPilot on non-Tormach Machines > > On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 8:24 AM <ken.stra...@sympatico.ca> wrote: > > > To me this is the minimum level of magic required to make a > > commercially viable product. The vast majority of potential users are > > uncomfortable (or don't want to bother) with manually modifying > > configuration files. Of course the power of LinuxCNC is due to the > > possibility of configuring things for all sorts of hardware. Without > > magic the flexibility means that it will never be mainstream. > > Nobody wants to give up the flexibility though. The problem that lcnc has > is aptly summarized in this thread where someone gave up because they > wanted > to use an Rpi4 and ethercat. That's fine, and there are plenty of people > that have ethercat running with lcnc, maybe even on a Rpi4. But both the > Rpi4 and ethercat require a bit of messing around, I think, and neither are > really mainline lcnc. Getting a 3 axis running on a Mesa board on a PC > with > decent latency (another sticking point, unfortunately) is trivial. Someone > mentioned 4 axis. The problem with that is that everyone has their own 4th > axis. This is also the problem with lcnc in general. I would say more > than > 90% of the problems I see with people having trouble setting up lcnc is > they > have a totally nonstandard install that wouldn't work with any other > software either. So they can't get it to work with lcnc, buy something > standard, and go install Mach. And then badmouth lcnc any time the subject > comes up. > > The people that want to make lcnc more popular could do something about it, > I think. Define a set of hardware that works and make their own > distribution with only one user interface. It doesn't surprise me that > nobody wants to do this thankless task. > Eric Keller > Boalsburg, Pennsylvania > > > _______________________________________________ > Emc-users mailing list > Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users > > > > _______________________________________________ > Emc-users mailing list > Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users > -- Addressee is the intended audience. If you are not the addressee then my consent is not given for you to read this email furthermore it is my wish you would close this without saving or reading, and cease and desist from saving or opening my private correspondence. Thank you for honoring my wish. _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
