On 1/25/23 17:33, Linden via Emc-users wrote:
Well said. I see the same both in Europe and North America in all the various 
fields of industry I deal with.

On January 25, 2023 2:11:20 p.m. PST, Chris Albertson 
<albertson.ch...@gmail.com> wrote:
The root of the issue here is that LCNC is not a product.  It is a
development environment where a person can, with some effort, develop a
product.

Then the problem is that as a group, machinists tend not to have computer
skills or much interest in learning computer skills.  What we see on this
email list is the one-in-the-thousand exception.  Most machinists just want
to make parts and not futz with the tools, especially if the tools involve
computers.

We are still in a transition period.  Today most machinists are older men
who actually hate and resent CNC.  They spent a lifetime learning to turn
handwheels and now some voodoo-magic boxes they don't understand completely
outclasses their hard-won skill.    The new class of machinist are
different.  They are more like engineers then blue color factory
machinists.  These new guys see g-code as the product and parts as the
byproduct and most of this new generation is not used to making anything by
hand.

We are still in the transitional period where we see a mix of the old guys
who have adapted to new ways, new people who have never made anything by
hand and the few of us on this list who actualy like to mess with tools.


And I guess that includes me, who grew up in an age of 2a3's for audio amps, became a broadcast Chief Engineer on an 8th grade education, followed the transition to digital, wrote my first program useful to a tv stations production process, so useful in fact that it was still in use 16 years later before the studios burnt to the ground. On an rca 1802 micro. 4k of static ram was $400 back then. And it used lots of self modifying code that I restored to original state at the end of each 60th of a second loop. The only thing that crashed it was a power failure that outlasted the 6 vol gel cell I'd rigged for a backup supply. It was a year later when someone wrote in computer shopper that self modifying code was a no-no.

I'm slowly making headway at CAD, using OpenSCAD to make stuff on a batch of 3d printers, but when I run LinuxCNC, 99.9% of the time its gcode I wrote by hand. I've got a 90 line program that just for the hell of it, sharpens a dull 10" carbide tipped tablesaw blade, puts about 72 hours on a dremel clamped to the mills head. Result, a blade I used for 3 years before it made the first burn mark on some cherry, cutting up nearly $3000 worth of white ash, mahogany, hard maple, and cherry as I made some furniture for me and one of my neighbors.

Am I that unusual? I'd like to think not, I'm now 88, alone, and find I'm looking up gcodes more often as the short term memory goes to pot.

For me, LinuxCNC IS the ideal development platform. Mach 3 or 4 to me is best described as half done for the unwary sucker. I have not found anything I wanted to do that hal, python and others here haven't shown me how to git-r-done.

I'm also a Certified Electronics Technician who can show an EE how to get his hands dirty, and don't often hesitate to help the more mechanically minded here. Call me a frustrated teacher at times. Or a JOAT, but there are several on this list that handily qualify for that title.

I also know where the door and coat rack is. Thank you all for putting up with me.

Take care & stay well, everybody.

Torrmach did a good thing by turning LCNC into a marketable product.

On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 1:30 PM John Dammeyer <jo...@autoartisans.com>
wrote:

Hi Todd,
First of all that LCNC can run 8 head/spindle gang... machine has nothing
to do with the subject line.

And the grumble I often hear from people who have attempted or looked into
LinuxCNC for their system is nicely summarized by your statement:

" Linuxcnc isn't for everyone.  The companies willing to support and hold
the hand of a green noob who isn't interested in learning anything, charge
accordingly."

Or as generally interpreted by most:  "F Off if you are a green noob and
can't figure out LCNC or Linux"

Personally I think the theme of the original post and conversation was how
easy is it to create a turnkey system that runs Path Pilot on non Tormach
Hardware.

IMHO, a lot more people would be interested in LCNC if there was a simple
easy to follow, step by step method of setting up a 4 axis mill.  The
menu's for setting up motors etc. in AXIS either for the parallel port
(almost extinct) or the MESA boards is really good but doesn't go far
enough.

There are a few youtube videos out there that show how to select motors
based on mass of the system and acme or ball screw or belt reduction.  But
the learning curve is steep and is just easier with systems that are not
LCNC.

John

-----Original Message-----
From: Todd Zuercher [mailto:to...@pgrahamdunn.com]
Sent: January-24-23 11:45 AM
To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Running PathPilot on non-Tormach Machines

I'd like see the retrofit CNC package on the market (other than
Linuxcnc) that can run an 8 head/spindle gang
router, with individual Z axis and VFD control for each spindle.  I'm
sorry but freedom of customization comes
at the cost of complexity.  If you want the freedom to be able to
use/run almost anything, you're going to
have to know something about both the hardware and software.  You want
simple buy some simple 4 axis all
in one stepper box and plug it in.

Linuxcnc isn't for everyone.  The companies willing to support and hold
the hand of a green noob who isn't
interested in learning anything, charge accordingly.

Todd Zuercher
P. Graham Dunn Inc.
630 Henry Street
Dalton, Ohio 44618
Phone:  (330)828-2105ext. 2031

-----Original Message-----
From: John Dammeyer <jo...@autoartisans.com>
Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2023 1:39 PM
To: 'Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)' <emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net

Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Running PathPilot on non-Tormach Machines

[EXTERNAL EMAIL] Be sure links are safe.

From: Andy Pugh [mailto:bodge...@gmail.com]
On 24 Jan 2023, at 15:38, ken.stra...@sympatico.ca wrote:

But seriously, in my opinion a major impediment to the widescale
adoption of LinuxCNC is the lack of an appealing and intuitive UI.

There are around 12 user interfaces. Are you saying that they are
_all_ terrible?


I'll jump in on this one.   They are _all_ great and they are _all_
terrible.

Imagine your average home shop machinist.  His kids are finally out the
door and he's at an income level
where he's got his lathe with a DRO and he just bought a small mill.  He
starts looking at CNC.

At work and at home he uses Windows.  And he's bought into the free
Fusion 360 con job for CAD/CAM and is
now looking at how to add CNC to his mill.

OMG.  What a hodge podge of systems.

So he starts on the various groups looking for what is available
including even AliExpress which has CNC boxes
for $300.

Not having used CNC before and not knowing anyone local the youtube
videos become his other source of
information and education.  The most interesting ones appear to be ones
with 10's of thousands of
subscribers that in fact are really long mostly to have multiple
advertisers.  But at the time he's not aware that
the videos are short on information, long on con for supporting lots of
advertising.

IMHO, the more advertisements in really long videos the more likely the
poster is there to monetize than to
actually provide useful help.   How interesting to watch a milling
cutter for 2 minutes go back and forth
making chips.  Oh, and now another advertisement.

So someone on a forum recommends MESA.

https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fstore.mesanet.com%2Findex.php%3F

route%3Dproduct%2Fproduct%26path%3D83_84%26product_id%3D215&data=05%7C01%7Ctoddz%40pgra
hamdunn.com
%7C040364ad9343477cf2fb08dafe3a6977%7C5758544c573f47cebee96c3e0806fb43%7C0%

7C0%7C638101824085494729%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiL

CJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=QsuaNDdgukaAklsVBzraskOqkJrgDYP%2B7
e9BcWa62nI%3D&reserved=0
Hmm.  Out of stock.  And even if it were, there's no diagram like the
ACORN one.  So no idea where to start...

Oh but then someone suggests

https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fstore.mesanet.com%2Findex.php%3F

route%3Dproduct%2Fproduct%26product_id%3D381%26search%3D7i92&data=05%7C01%7Ctoddz%40pgra
hamdunn.com
%7C040364ad9343477cf2fb08dafe3a6977%7C5758544c573f47cebee96c3e0806fb43%7C0%

7C0%7C638101824085494729%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiL

CJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=lNSWiCwuqqIMsYjHAEfR9JqJAjsWNK9DeF
9GsKztVJg%3D&reserved=0

Now I need to wire to it.  A suggestion comes up for two of these and
cheap too.

https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.aliexpress.com%2Fitem%2F33
015669728.html&data=05%7C01%7Ctoddz%40pgrahamdunn.com
%7C040364ad9343477cf2fb08dafe3a697

7%7C5758544c573f47cebee96c3e0806fb43%7C0%7C0%7C638101824085494729%7CUnknown%7CTWFpb

GZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7
C&sdata=LclFcxiqe05h7ZMNmrFS3%2Fri1wQ7cRfBl1KFG0z51OQ%3D&reserved=0

Next motors and power supplies.  What to buy?  People rave about these
new step-servos.  One brand in
particular.  But what size?  Direct coupled or with belts and pulleys?

So back to the internet and youtube.  Ah, this guy has a mill like
mine.  He used the Leadshine step servos and
ACORN.   Ordered, installed as per the youtube video.  Making chips.

And he doesn't have to wade through deciding which of _all_ 12 or so
LCNC user interfaces to use.

The above is I think the typical thought processes.

I'm still using AXIS.  Can't be bothered to spend the time trying to
figure out whether I should spend $400 for a
touch screen HDMI 21" screen or some other user interface.  Really miss
the MACROs from MACH3 though.  I
think that's what's called the conversational interface on Tormach?

John




_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net

https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.sourceforge.net%2Flists%2Flistin
fo%2Femc-
users&data=05%7C01%7Ctoddz%40pgrahamdunn.com
%7C040364ad9343477cf2fb08dafe3a6977%7C57585

44c573f47cebee96c3e0806fb43%7C0%7C0%7C638101824085494729%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJ

WIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=R3
B7SVuYgzAgLRBVbhziV0q1g1QJi0lI1vbmlsoWvsA%3D&reserved=0


_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users



_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users



--

Chris Albertson
Redondo Beach, California

_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
.

Cheers, Gene Heskett.
--
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author, 1940)
If we desire respect for the law, we must first make the law respectable.
 - Louis D. Brandeis
Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/>



_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to