On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 12:49 PM, Mark Callow <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 08/07/2014 04:04, Sathyanarayanan Gunasekaran wrote: > > I think SDL2 is used enough that emscripten benefits from integrating > the cross compiled SDL2 into master, but this could to increase in > size(the cross compiled bitcode is 1.4M). Do we want to integrate this > into emscripten? Thoughts? > > > I think SDL2 should be integrated to master. The currently included SDL > version is not useful for porting as there is no native version. > > I am still trying to get the test version to work in my project. I was off > for a couple of days but am about to resume the effort. > Maybe I'm nuts, but why effectively create a fork of SDL2? Why not have this merge upstream? A build bot could still be set up to build and pull SDL2 and run tests using the current / incoming / whatever version of emscripten. - Bruce -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "emscripten-discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
