On 09/07/2014 06:32, Alon Zakai wrote:
>
>
> In summary, here are some options here:
>
> 1. Merge SDL2 into our main repo. People just grab emscripten, and can
> then build with -lSDL2 and it works. This is what we do with libc,
> libc++abi, libc++ (and some JS-implemented libraries like SDL1.3,
> glew, glut, etc.). This seems easiest for everyone.
>
> 2. Keep our SDL2 fork in a separate repo by itself. People need to
> grab it manually and link with it.
>
> 3. Keep our SDL2 fork in a separate repo of ported projects, that has
> some system for making it convenient to use. That is, there is an easy
> way to get and build and integrate with emcc any of the projects there.
>
>
I prefer option 1 and as Chad said, it should replace SDL 1.3 since that
is now a non-existent version in native. You won't find it at
libsdl.org. I think 2 is unacceptable given that we need to replace SDL 1.3.
Regards
-Mark
--
注意：この電子メールには、株式会社エイチアイの機密情報が含まれている場合
が有ります。正式なメール受信者では無い場合はメール複製、 再配信または情
報の使用を固く禁じております。エラー、手違いでこのメールを受け取られまし
たら削除を行い配信者にご連絡をお願いいたし ます.
NOTE: This electronic mail message may contain confidential and
privileged information from HI Corporation. If you are not the intended
recipient, any disclosure, photocopying, distribution or use of the
contents of the received information is prohibited. If you have received
this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and
permanently delete this message and all related copies.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"emscripten-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
