Hi, On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 10:52 PM, Bruce Mitchener <[email protected]> wrote: > > Maybe I'm nuts, but why effectively create a fork of SDL2? Why not have this > merge upstream?
It is going to be merged upstream. See - http://lists.libsdl.org/pipermail/sdl-libsdl.org/2014-July/095475.html https://twitter.com/icculus/status/485639842823700481 > A build bot could still be set up to build and pull SDL2 and run tests using > the current / incoming / whatever version of emscripten. Good idea! Although not sure if we want to run the SDL2 tests at all. The emscripten SDL1.x tests have been ported over to SDL2[0][1], so that should be good enough IMHO. Thanks, --Sathya [0]: https://github.com/gsathya/SDL-emscripten/wiki/Emscripten-tests [1]: https://github.com/gsathya/emscripten/tree/sdl > - Bruce > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "emscripten-discuss" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "emscripten-discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
