I agree with Floh that it probably won't help much on gzip size. Also it might make things slower (some variables might have undefined instead of 0, etc., so more types to track), and you'd need to be careful to only remove actually redundant things (some |0's are necessary).
But you can test something close to this pretty easily, build with --closure 2 which will run closure advanced on the asm.js code. That should remove obviously-redundant asm.js things. On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 10:58 PM, caiiiycuk <caiiiy...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi. Beacuse of google-chrome bug, and some other reasons I can't use > asm.js in my scripts. Currently I just replace "use asm"; to ""; For my > case is very important to reduce js size as much as possible. If I revert > all asm.js stuff (type declarations and etc.) to plain js, how do you think > how much size I can reduce? > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "emscripten-discuss" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to emscripten-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "emscripten-discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to emscripten-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
