I don't know why the .mem files have that extension, I just rename them to
.mem.txt afterwards for the same effect. If you have control over your web
server config that's not an issue though. Only with github and other
hosting solution you have no full control over.
I'm tending towards moving the mem files back into the asm.js file anyway
though, my demos usually have small static data, so the separate download
isn't worth it.
Cheers,
-Floh.
Am Montag, 23. Oktober 2017 19:45:42 UTC+2 schrieb caiiiycuk:
>
> Thank you :) I see that asm.js do not produce much overhead. Floh,
> thank you for great article, btw why mem file have mem extension, not
> mem.js? For my projects I rename this file to mem.js (and replace all
> occurrences in js) to get auto gzip features, etc.
>
> 2017-10-19 0:03 GMT+07:00 Charles Vaughn <cva...@gmail.com <javascript:>>:
>
> > You could get rid of the |0 on HEAP[x]|0 and on constant expressions
> (like
> > u=u+32|0).
> >
> > You can also forward propagate the integer coercion to elide the
> function
> > preambles that coerce their parameters. An example would be taking
> >
> > function pG(a,b){a=a|0;b=b|0;return $FU(a,b,1217,4169,4177)|0}
> >
> > And converting it to
> > function pG(a,b){return $FU(a|0,b|0,1217,4169,4177)|0}
> >
> > On Wednesday, October 18, 2017 at 8:29:56 AM UTC-7, Alon Zakai wrote:
> >>
> >> I agree with Floh that it probably won't help much on gzip size. Also
> it
> >> might make things slower (some variables might have undefined instead
> of 0,
> >> etc., so more types to track), and you'd need to be careful to only
> remove
> >> actually redundant things (some |0's are necessary).
> >>
> >> But you can test something close to this pretty easily, build with
> >> --closure 2 which will run closure advanced on the asm.js code. That
> should
> >> remove obviously-redundant asm.js things.
> >>
> >> On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 10:58 PM, caiiiycuk <caii...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi. Beacuse of google-chrome bug, and some other reasons I can't use
> >>> asm.js in my scripts. Currently I just replace "use asm"; to ""; For
> my case
> >>> is very important to reduce js size as much as possible. If I revert
> all
> >>> asm.js stuff (type declarations and etc.) to plain js, how do you
> think how
> >>> much size I can reduce?
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups
> >>> "emscripten-discuss" group.
> >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> an
> >>> email to emscripten-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>.
>
> >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
> >>
> >>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups
> > "emscripten-discuss" group.
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> an
> > email to emscripten-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>.
> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"emscripten-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to emscripten-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
