Good point, when I tried the previous version of that feature (which was 
called *duplicate* function elimination) it only removed a 2 or 3 kilobytes 
(less than 1%) with my code bases on average, so I didn't pay too much 
attention ;)

Am Montag, 23. Oktober 2017 20:02:17 UTC+2 schrieb caiiiycuk:
>
> Also, you defenitely should add this 
> https://github.com/achoudhury85/Similar-Function-Elimination to your 
> article. For big codebase it's work really cool, usually it reduce 
> code by 20% (in my case 2-3Mb). 
>
> 2017-10-24 0:49 GMT+07:00 Floh <flo...@gmail.com <javascript:>>: 
> > I don't know why the .mem files have that extension, I just rename them 
> to 
> > .mem.txt afterwards for the same effect. If you have control over your 
> web 
> > server config that's not an issue though. Only with github and other 
> hosting 
> > solution you have no full control over. 
> > 
> > I'm tending towards moving the mem files back into the asm.js file 
> anyway 
> > though, my demos usually have small static data, so the separate 
> download 
> > isn't worth it. 
> > 
> > Cheers, 
> > -Floh. 
> > 
> > Am Montag, 23. Oktober 2017 19:45:42 UTC+2 schrieb caiiiycuk: 
> >> 
> >> Thank you :) I see that asm.js do not produce much overhead. Floh, 
> >> thank you for great article, btw why mem file have mem extension, not 
> >> mem.js? For my projects I rename this file to mem.js (and replace all 
> >> occurrences in js) to get auto gzip features, etc. 
> >> 
> >> 2017-10-19 0:03 GMT+07:00 Charles Vaughn <cva...@gmail.com>: 
> >> > You could get rid of the |0 on HEAP[x]|0 and on constant expressions 
> >> > (like 
> >> > u=u+32|0). 
> >> > 
> >> > You can also forward propagate the integer coercion to elide the 
> >> > function 
> >> > preambles that coerce their parameters. An example would be taking 
> >> > 
> >> > function pG(a,b){a=a|0;b=b|0;return $FU(a,b,1217,4169,4177)|0} 
> >> > 
> >> > And converting it to 
> >> > function pG(a,b){return $FU(a|0,b|0,1217,4169,4177)|0} 
> >> > 
> >> > On Wednesday, October 18, 2017 at 8:29:56 AM UTC-7, Alon Zakai wrote: 
> >> >> 
> >> >> I agree with Floh that it probably won't help much on gzip size. 
> Also 
> >> >> it 
> >> >> might make things slower (some variables might have undefined 
> instead 
> >> >> of 0, 
> >> >> etc., so more types to track), and you'd need to be careful to only 
> >> >> remove 
> >> >> actually redundant things (some |0's are necessary). 
> >> >> 
> >> >> But you can test something close to this pretty easily, build with 
> >> >> --closure 2 which will run closure advanced on the asm.js code. That 
> >> >> should 
> >> >> remove obviously-redundant asm.js things. 
> >> >> 
> >> >> On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 10:58 PM, caiiiycuk <caii...@gmail.com> 
> wrote: 
> >> >>> 
> >> >>> Hi. Beacuse of google-chrome bug, and some other reasons I can't 
> use 
> >> >>> asm.js in my scripts. Currently I just replace "use asm"; to ""; 
> For 
> >> >>> my case 
> >> >>> is very important to reduce js size as much as possible. If I 
> revert 
> >> >>> all 
> >> >>> asm.js stuff (type declarations and etc.) to plain js, how do you 
> >> >>> think how 
> >> >>> much size I can reduce? 
> >> >>> 
> >> >>> -- 
> >> >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> >> >>> Groups 
> >> >>> "emscripten-discuss" group. 
> >> >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
> send 
> >> >>> an 
> >> >>> email to emscripten-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
> <javascript:>. 
> >> >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. 
> >> >> 
> >> >> 
> >> > -- 
> >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> >> > Groups 
> >> > "emscripten-discuss" group. 
> >> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
> send 
> >> > an 
> >> > email to emscripten-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
> <javascript:>. 
> >> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. 
> > 
> > -- 
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> Groups 
> > "emscripten-discuss" group. 
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
> an 
> > email to emscripten-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>. 
> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. 
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"emscripten-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to emscripten-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to