Both are pretty popular. Why not list them both? As for which one to be mandatory to implement, someone should to a search through other systems (e.g. IEEE, IPSec) and see which one is most popular.

Hannes Tschofenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all,

the current version of the document
http://tools.ietf.org/wg/emu/draft-clancy-emu-eap-shared-secret-01.txt
still supports AES-EAX:

+-----------+----+-------------+---------------+--------------------+
| CSuite/ | KS | Encryption | Integrity | Key Derivation |
| Specifier | | | | Function |
+-----------+----+-------------+---------------+--------------------+
| 0x000001 | 16 | AES-EAX-128 | AES-CMAC-128 | GKDF-128 |
+-----------+----+-------------+---------------+--------------------+

At the IETF#66 EMU meeting AES CCM was suggested.

Later, it got the impression that AES-CBC was more appreciated. Should
we update the draft with AES-CBC?

Ciao
Hannes


_______________________________________________
Emu mailing list
Emu@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu


Do you Yahoo!?
Get on board. You're invited to try the new Yahoo! Mail Beta.
_______________________________________________
Emu mailing list
Emu@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu

Reply via email to