Hi, > Actually, I was pleasantly surprised that "Internet Tunneled EAP Method" > turned out to be ITEM but in any case...I'm sure that there is no policy > except maybe having a little fun ;-). Maybe that should be against > policy? I do think that EAP-TUNNEL is both grammatically incorrect > (since "tunnel" is a common noun it shouldn't be capitalized, let alone > ALL CAPS :-).
I didn't want to violate more common thinking about naming by using non-capitals! EAP-Tunnel would be just as fine for me. > Also, I wonder if it isn't a bit too generic: there are a > whole bunch of PEAP clones (sorry, tunneled methods) already: TTLS, > FAST, etc., all of which could be reasonably referred to as "EAP TUNNEL". That's right. We should prefix it as "*/the/*" EAP Tunnel to make people aware that it's the one-and-only type to be used. Yes, I'm actually dreaming that the deployed world out there would settle to use just one in a distant future... Stefan -- Stefan WINTER Ingenieur de Recherche Fondation RESTENA - Réseau Téléinformatique de l'Education Nationale et de la Recherche 6, rue Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi L-1359 Luxembourg Tel: +352 424409 1 Fax: +352 422473
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Emu mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
