On Wed, February 29, 2012 9:57 pm, Joe Salowey wrote:
> The current tunnel method draft contains TLVs for PKCS#10 and PKCS#7 TLVs.
>
> The purpose of either of these TLVs is not well described.   I think we
> need to describe the purpose of these TLVs better or remove them.
>
> The PKCS#10 TLV makes a brief reference to the Simple PKI request of CMS
> (RFC 5272), but does not provide much more description than that
> reference.
>
> The PKCS#7 TLV doesn't really describe it usage.  It could be used to
> carry the enrollment response, or it could be used to send a root
> certificate to the peer in the case where an inner method is used to
> authenticate the tunnel.
>
> It doesn't seem that either of these is a complete enough specification.
>
> Does someone care enough about this functionality to provide better and
> more complete test for it?

  I care about this functionality and will be willing to describe
the syntax of these messages but what test are you talking about?

  Dan.


_______________________________________________
Emu mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu

Reply via email to