On Feb 29, 2012, at 10:09 PM, Dan Harkins wrote: > > On Wed, February 29, 2012 9:57 pm, Joe Salowey wrote: >> The current tunnel method draft contains TLVs for PKCS#10 and PKCS#7 TLVs. >> >> The purpose of either of these TLVs is not well described. I think we >> need to describe the purpose of these TLVs better or remove them. >> >> The PKCS#10 TLV makes a brief reference to the Simple PKI request of CMS >> (RFC 5272), but does not provide much more description than that >> reference. >> >> The PKCS#7 TLV doesn't really describe it usage. It could be used to >> carry the enrollment response, or it could be used to send a root >> certificate to the peer in the case where an inner method is used to >> authenticate the tunnel. >> >> It doesn't seem that either of these is a complete enough specification. >> >> Does someone care enough about this functionality to provide better and >> more complete test for it? > > I care about this functionality and will be willing to describe > the syntax of these messages but what test are you talking about? >
[Joe] Thanks Dan, I was thinking of walking on hot coals... Ooops, I meant text. > Dan. > > _______________________________________________ Emu mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
