On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 7:34 AM Eliot Lear <l...@cisco.com> wrote:

> > On 11 Oct 2019, at 16:09, Michael Richardson <m...@sandelman.ca> wrote:
> >
> > So, can wired just be a degenerate version of wifi, where there can be
> only
> > one "ESSID", and there are no beacons to consider?
> On the whole that has been my thought.  But it is a matter of which
> mechanism to degenerate to.  Is it TLS-PSK?  eDPP++?  TLS with naked public
> keys++?  And again, this is the on-prem case.  For cloud, we are well along.

[Joe] We are currently in a holding pattern with EAP-TLS.  It does not seem
right to delay it for functionality that we are not sure we have a use case
for.  If a use case develops then we can publish an update to EAP-TLS 1.3.
Do we have a use case for EAP-TLS-PSK that is blocked in the current

> Eliot
Emu mailing list

Reply via email to