Eliot Lear <l...@cisco.com> wrote: > Before we nail this down, it seems like we need to have a discussion > about how best to onboard wired IoT devices in particular from an > on-prem view. The issue here is that EAP-TLS-PSK is useful for that > purpose, as we discussed. Now there is nothing particularly special > about PSK and we could run with a naked public key pair as well in 1.3, > but we have to choose something.
okay, so why do you prefer PSK? > The fundamental question is what does > a manufacturer stamp into the device and what is placed on a label. We > have a running example of DPP doing this for wireless with public key > code, but that doesn’t get us to proper onboarding for wired – the > signaling just isn’t there. I don't understand this. Are you saying that because it's wired, people do not expect to scan anything? -- ] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [ ] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | network architect [ ] m...@sandelman.ca http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails [
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Emu mailing list Emu@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu