On Feb 6, 2021, at 8:22 PM, Joseph Salowey <[email protected]> wrote: > 1. Please respond to the list if you support adding explicit result > indications of success and failure from the EAP Server to the EAP Peer in > EAP-TLS 1.3. If you object please respond to the list indicating why.
I support it. > 2. Please respond to the list if you support using TLS close_notify alert for > a success indication and TLS error alert for a failure indication. If you > object please respond to the list indicating why. I support the TLS error alert for a failure indication. I would prefer sending one byte of application data instead of close_notify. For the simple reason that it better unifies the code paths for all TLS-based EAP methods. That being said, we definitely need *a* protected success indication. Alan DeKok. _______________________________________________ Emu mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
