On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 3:32 AM Alan DeKok <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Feb 19, 2021, at 12:26 AM, Joseph Salowey <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'd like to hear from implementers about their experience with this > mechanism: > > Was this both Peer and server implementation? > > > 1. Have you implemented the zero byte application record signa? If not, > why not?l > > Yes. > > > a. Is it sent after receiving the client finished? > > Originally no, but now yes. > > > b. Do you anticipate problems if the application record comes before or > after a NewSessionTicket message? > > No. > > > c. did you run into any issues with this mechanism? > > No. > > > 2. Have you implemented the close notify method? If not, why not? > > Yes. Right now, it's a secret configurable flag to switch between these > options. > > > a. Is it sent after receiving the client finished? > > Yes. > > > b. Were you able to cause the message to be sent for the server or > determine that the message was received for the peer/supplicant? > > Yes. > > > c. Did you run into any issues with this mechanism? > > No. > > Alan DeKok. > >
_______________________________________________ Emu mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
