Jan-Frederik Rieckers <rieck...@dfn.de> wrote:
> I just posted a new version of the EAP-FIDO draft.
> We had some discussion on the name "EAP-FIDO" at the last IETF and we
> have come up with some name options since, but none of them resonate
> with me yet.
I see the issue.
> I have started a pad with different name options, everyone is invited
> to chime in: https://md.kif.rocks/VcVOg34pSFWh64Ev_JsG6Q
I contributed EAP-SeaTAP.
I also don't like any of the options listed, but EAP-FIDO won't fly with me.
> I am planning to work on an implementation during the hackathon to have
> a better understanding and can identify possible missing spec and the
> different error conditions that we need to signal.
:-)
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Emu mailing list Emu@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
