On 29.04.15 00:43, Doug Barton wrote: > On 4/28/15 1:02 PM, Ludwig Hügelschäfer wrote: >> But the real resolution would be PGP/MIME. Why is >> this not an option for you? > > Ludwig, it's not appropriate to bully people into using PGP/MIME.
That's far away from bullying. I was suggesting a solution and wanted to know why he was excluding it in his other post. > The > behavior Johannes is describing sounds very much like a bug to me, so it > should be resolved. Well, as he wrote, a probable reason for a frequent encounter of this dialog is long lines stemming from URLs in his messages. Background: Lines exceeding 72 characters require wrapping to avoid failing signature when using inline PGP. However, the TB internal wrapper fails to wrap if the line does not contain spaces (like e.g. long URLs), so hard wrapping had to be implemented. This was the situation described in bug 3. Resolution for this landed in Enigmail 1.8 and offers a user dialog with the selection he described. Ludwig
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ enigmail-users mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe or make changes to your subscription click here: https://admin.hostpoint.ch/mailman/listinfo/enigmail-users_enigmail.net
