On Tuesday, 01 March 2005, at 15:56:33 (+0900), Carsten Haitzler wrote: > no one said it was a magical cure. it was a fixup of doing hack of > _preX after the version to turn it into a raw numeric.
Okay, then explain to me why you added the .001 to 18 packages in CVS when ONLY THREE of them had _pre in the version. > no u didn't :) this is irrelevant. i repeat - the .001 REPLACED _preXX Again...see above. You still have not responded to this even though I've asked twice. > now purely numeric which makes it easier/possible to compare trivially You still haven't solved the fundamental problem of comparing non-integers. .001 is no more of an integer than .pre_XX > allows for automated snapshots. people accuse us of never releasing > anything - but a big reason is that making a release is a PAIN IN > THE ARSE because its 20 different packages that all need > bumping. this is a step in trying to fix that. I don't understand how changing 18 different snapshot numbers on a weekly (or more) basis is easier than changing 18 different version numbers on a bi-monthly or tri-monthly basis. Michael -- Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX) http://www.kainx.org/ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> n + 1, Inc., http://www.nplus1.net/ Author, Eterm (www.eterm.org) ----------------------------------------------------------------------- "You like apples? Yeah? Well, I got her number! How about them apples??!" -- Matt Damon, "Good Will Hunting" ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel