On Thu, Mar 30, 2006 at 08:53:29AM +0900, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 07:33:08 -0800 "Blake B." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > > > > > On Mar 29, 2006, at 1:45 AM, Vlad Alyukov wrote: > > > > > EC> changelog.cin ... errr... not right. > > > > > > EC> do the people doing debian packaging... actually test things? > > > > There were some half-baked commits just before CVS was taken down. I > > hope to clean it up this week and get all packages building for the > > weekend. > > ok. i think i might have to poke my finger into it all too - i notice some > totally outrageous "build requirements" (ecore REQUIRES libdiretfb? no - it's > optional and i don't think we should be shipping it as then the final e > install will drag in dfb w2hen actually no apps "use" it - it's there for > special case development). also packages need splitting up into more > fine-grained lumps > if there're no objections i'll split libecore0 into the following packages (which will hopefully fix the dependency issues as well):
libecore0 libecore0-config libecore0-con libecore0-dbus libecore0-directfb libecore0-evas libecore0-fb libecore0-file libecore0-ipc libecore0-job libecore0-txt libecore0-x are there packages which can be merged into one? libecore0-dev will contain all available headers, as it is right now. or should i split that one, too? Falko ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
