On Thu, Mar 30, 2006 at 11:12:15PM +0900, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > On Thu, 30 Mar 2006 15:09:32 +0200 Falko Schmidt > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > > > On Thu, Mar 30, 2006 at 08:53:29AM +0900, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > > > On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 07:33:08 -0800 "Blake B." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > > > > > > > > > > > On Mar 29, 2006, at 1:45 AM, Vlad Alyukov wrote: > > > > > > > > > EC> changelog.cin ... errr... not right. > > > > > > > > > > EC> do the people doing debian packaging... actually test things? > > > > > > > > There were some half-baked commits just before CVS was taken down. I > > > > hope to clean it up this week and get all packages building for the > > > > weekend. > > > > > > ok. i think i might have to poke my finger into it all too - i notice some > > > totally outrageous "build requirements" (ecore REQUIRES libdiretfb? no - > > > it's optional and i don't think we should be shipping it as then the final > > > e install will drag in dfb w2hen actually no apps "use" it - it's there > > > for > > > special case development). also packages need splitting up into more > > > fine-grained lumps > > > > > if there're no objections i'll split libecore0 into the following > > packages (which will hopefully fix the dependency issues as well): > > > > libecore0 > > libecore0-config > > libecore0-con > > libecore0-dbus > > libecore0-directfb > > libecore0-evas > > libecore0-fb > > libecore0-file > > libecore0-ipc > > libecore0-job > > libecore0-txt > > libecore0-x > > > > are there packages which can be merged into one? > > i like the split this way. it gives fine-grained control. auto-dependency > resolving will make sure the right subset is installed. > fine then. i just commited the new .install and control files. hope everything is alright. if you're not too busy, i'd be glad if you took a quick look at the dependencies somewhen and tell me if you see any missing or unnecessary libraries. i grepped the code for #include's and checked the .so's with ldd and found some missing dependencies in the former debian control file which should now be fixed. one more question though: do we need the fonts in data/fonts? i didn't find any related part which loads fonts. if they're needed indeed, shouldn't i better make libecore0 depend on the appropriate debian font package?
> > libecore0-dev will contain all available headers, as it is right now. or > > should i split that one, too? > > it will have to suck in all the above libs then. > yep, it does. Falko ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
