On Fri, 27 Oct 2017 09:29:21 +0000 Andrew Williams <a...@andywilliams.me> said:

> Hi,
> 
> I have realised today that as we move away from the legacy APIs and the
> doxygen they contain to a pure eo interfaces approach (as at
> https://www.enlightenment.org/develop/api/) we are not covering eina_ or
> eo_ (with the exception of a few types that are referenced).

yup. i know. :) this is one of those "what will we do?" things. this needs
documenting of course. how? good q.

> Has anyone figured a strategy for making sure that eina's fundamental
> underpinnings of our interfaces get included in the documentation we are
> generating? Apologies if this is in progress or planned but I don't recall
> it being discussed recently so wonder if there is a hole in our current
> approach.
> 
> Thanks,
> Andy
> -- 
> http://andywilliams.me
> http://ajwillia.ms
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> enlightenment-devel mailing list
> enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
> 


-- 
------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" --------------
Carsten Haitzler - ras...@rasterman.com


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to