OK thanks - added https://phab.enlightenment.org/T6280 to cover that.
Andy On Fri, 27 Oct 2017 at 12:11 Carsten Haitzler <ras...@rasterman.com> wrote: > On Fri, 27 Oct 2017 09:29:21 +0000 Andrew Williams <a...@andywilliams.me> > said: > > > Hi, > > > > I have realised today that as we move away from the legacy APIs and the > > doxygen they contain to a pure eo interfaces approach (as at > > https://www.enlightenment.org/develop/api/) we are not covering eina_ or > > eo_ (with the exception of a few types that are referenced). > > yup. i know. :) this is one of those "what will we do?" things. this needs > documenting of course. how? good q. > > > Has anyone figured a strategy for making sure that eina's fundamental > > underpinnings of our interfaces get included in the documentation we are > > generating? Apologies if this is in progress or planned but I don't > recall > > it being discussed recently so wonder if there is a hole in our current > > approach. > > > > Thanks, > > Andy > > -- > > http://andywilliams.me > > http://ajwillia.ms > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > > _______________________________________________ > > enlightenment-devel mailing list > > enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel > > > > > -- > ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- > Carsten Haitzler - ras...@rasterman.com > > -- http://andywilliams.me http://ajwillia.ms ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
