On 12/18/2017 05:28 PM, Stephen Houston wrote:
"If we are to de-prioritise the new API at the cost of further development
of legacy APIs then we are prolonging the period of time in which we
request developers to use an API which we are intending to discontinue."
I don't disagree. But if we de-prioritize the old API at the cost of
furthering the development of new API then we are encouraging the
development of unstable apis that are not complete and won't have a stable
release for X amount of time. Which isn't exactly ideal either. I don't
think either option sounds great and it's going to get to a point of "Don't
use that api, it will be discontinued, but don't use that api either
because it is unstable, incomplete, and will change". New developers will
look at that say... uh... okay so what do I use? Something other than EFL.
I am glad to have developed my first application under efl (eegrep =
multidimensional grep).
With legacy API.
Should I regret not having used Gnome ?
PC
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
