On Mon, 18 Dec 2017 12:23:08 +0000 Andrew Williams <a...@andywilliams.me> said:

> Hi all.
> 
> Since adding Google Analytics a while back I have some interesting
> statistics that I thought I would share:
> 
> 1) Very few people read our Stable API documentation - around 0.5% of our
> page hits
> 2) Over 5% of the page hits are already for the beta API documentation

I'm willing to bet that this is mostly because of the work going on on these
and "checking the work when done" etc. and not "real traffic". At least until
this settles down I'd take these numbers with a grain of salt then look at
again.

> 3) Most of the hits to /docs seem to result in a referral to /develop
> 4) Nearly 40% of people landing on our home page leave right away

Not surprising. enlightenment is a common word.

> 5) Terminology is the most popular app (by page hits) and Edi is second
> (1/4 times the hits) then ephoto (1/4 again)

Also not surprising. :)

> Not all of this requires any action but here is the action plan:
> 1) I am not intending to put any further effort into our legacy API other
> than the extraction of eina and eo for the Beta API docs

Like others said. I think this might be a mistake. The legacy API is going to
be around and supported for years to come. Sure. eo/eina is important in where
we're going, but the legacy docs maybe should at least just be made to be "not
broken" as much as is sanely possible. Not saying we should go WRITE more docs
there... That's all. Unless this is what you had in mind?

> 2) We can expect more people to be trying to use our Beta API - do we need
> to prepare for this or should we put up more obvious warnings about
> attempting?

I thought the need for a #define to enable them was enough... perhaps some more
#warnings IF that define is set AND it's not the efl build itself... ? I still
think it's far too early to stabilize any of this. Even futures are still "not
done" and in flux. As is ecore (efl loop and friends/related).

> 3) I think it is time that the main "Develop" link goes to the /develop/
> dokuwiki. The link to phab exists on the /contrib page where it belongs

I guess that depends on the interpretation of "Develop". Developing as in a
USEE of EFL libraries and their APIs, or developing as in working on E/EFL/etc.
and EFL API's. It's a fine distinction.

> 4) We should find a way to make our home page more appealing - when loaded
> on an average monitor you need to be full screen to see anything more than
> the "Window manager" section.

Indeed it could be nicer. Using a wiki limits our formatting abilities as it's
simpler. I would have just had large screenshots of lots of stuff to start with
instead of text as really "oooh aaah pretty images" really works. At least
"front and foremost". But I'm holding off on doing this until flat theme is
done. At least then it'll be "oh finally they're flat" reactions.

How to present those screenshots... that is in and of itself a good question.
like a big horizontal banner then with a small bit of text (and links) below,
one after the other? One of those lightbox things that keeps flipping multiple
images with some js (would need a wiki plugin). for some things videos or
animated gifs might actually be the best as the wow factor is in watching it
move and react. Yes - it's a bandwidth hog, but it should have a huge impact vs
stills. Perhaps again - a wiki plugin with a "still image" until you mouseover
or maybe click/tap then the video/animated gif is loaded and plays? I don't
know. just trying a more concrete idea "float".

> 5) For our about page we may need to tell a better story about how it all
> fits together. Otherwise it's E & EFL and a list of apps - not the how or
> why of what we are doing...

Yes. Also the main pages like about need to just have less text and more
pictures. Reality is few will want to go through a wall of text. The wall of
text should be "further down the line" when they want to dig for info.

> Please shout if you disagree with any of these action points :)
> 
> Andrew
> -- 
> http://andywilliams.me
> http://ajwillia.ms
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> enlightenment-devel mailing list
> enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
> 


-- 
------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" --------------
Carsten Haitzler - ras...@rasterman.com


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to