On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 03:15:49PM -0400, Christopher Michael wrote: > Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > > On Mon, 3 Jul 2006 03:35:44 -0400 (EDT) Enlightenment CVS > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > > > > What was the reasoning for this? why would one need to pass the path to an > > module icon explicitly? (if you want to do your own icon in a dialog for a > > different dialog you can always do the dialog by hand?) > >
<-- snip --> > This was requested by Andy so that modules config dialogs could show > their icon in the border of their config dialogs. I think consistency > was his main goal and also so users can identify easily what config > dialog is for what module. > > If it is a problem I can roll it back and change the modules back to > previous way of showing the E icon on the border of the config dialog. > > dh I *think* he meant that e already knows where the modules icon is, so you you shouldn't need to pass th path in. That is, it should just use the icon by default. Brian Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
