Hello. On 17.05.2018 18:49, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote: > I think there is no need to ever build /dev/ branches since these can (and > sometimes should) be knowingly pushed even when they don't build. Only > feature/, stable, and master branches should ever be involved with CI.
I disagree on this. Having dev branches build allows the developer to have it build on systems where she might have no access to. Like macOS right now on Travis an most likely a windows build later on. Given how often the macOS build got broken before I take this as an actual advantage to have your dev branch build on it before you consider merging it into master. regards Stefan Schmidt ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
