On Wed, 23 May 2018 07:03:07 +0100 Stefan Schmidt <ste...@datenfreihafen.org> said:
> Hello. > > On 17.05.2018 18:49, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote: > > I think there is no need to ever build /dev/ branches since these can (and > > sometimes should) be knowingly pushed even when they don't build. Only > > feature/, stable, and master branches should ever be involved with CI. > > I disagree on this. > > Having dev branches build allows the developer to have it build on > systems where she might have no access to. Like macOS right now on > Travis an most likely a windows build later on. > > Given how often the macOS build got broken before I take this as an > actual advantage to have your dev branch build on it before you consider > merging it into master. i mostly agree with you there stefan. the only thing is that there are a lot of dev branches and most of the noise is for that developer, so keeping the noise targeted is probably key. :) -- ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- Carsten Haitzler - ras...@rasterman.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
