On Wednesday 14 February 2007, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > if it works for > devs - then it's good. if it doesn't work for users because they updated > their autofoo packages... TOO BAD. autofoo is for developers. using cvs > basically gives you the > responsibility of a developer when it comes to running autofoo tools. > developers job it sot produce a source tarball - that is the final product > for "consumers" (users). autofoo is used to create that tarball. it is not > used again after that point.
as already noted in previous threads, going from <automake-1.10 to >=automake-1.10 changes the error from an ignored runtime one on the user's system to a build time failure on the developer's system in other words, they're both wrong ... you're just choosing the one that "seems to work" :P -mike
pgpjQI30jjxuv.pgp
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
