On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 11:55:08AM -0400, Michael Jennings wrote:
> On Thursday, 15 March 2007, at 08:42:31 (-0500),
> Brian Mattern wrote:
>
> > The correct response to a dev breaking cvs is "hey, this broke, can
> > you fix it?"
>
> If the breakage is minor, I agree 100%. But in this situation, every
> single project that used ecore was broken. There are times when it
> has been necessary to revert big breakages until the person who broke
> it has a chance to fix it. raster's done it, I've done it...heck,
> you've even probably done it.
I'm far too lazy to revert peoples changes :)
I'll concede that in this case it was big enough to warrant reverting.
Maybe better commit messages ("this breaks compilation of anything that
depends on ecore, revert it for now") would help avoid hurting peoples
(admittedly a bit sensitive) feelings.
This project is just hobbling along with very few devs, most too busy or
too fed up with the squabbling to devote much time or effort.
So, mej, tone it down a bit (i know, its hard for you...) :)
And, caro, don't take everything so personally. Just fix what was broken
and re-commit your changes.
rephorm
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
