On Nov,Saturday 10 2007, at 3:46 PM, Michel BRIAND wrote: > Hi, > > Fist, your involvement and wisdom as team leader is respected and > appreciated ! > > Ulisses said: >> Formalising can be a good thing, I think. We could even try to change >> our workflow and start using git. What do you think? >> > > Yes, git is a good trade, everyone noticed that CVS is so slow, and > that's prevented devs from tagging releases in the past. > > Since there are many "packages" (libs & apps) to manage in parallel, > and provided that there is often large impact after a lib change, it's > of a good value to think about defining good procedures to > commit, update, build and test. > > So the good script e17_build should be included in the main source > tree, > and improved so that everything is built & tested against either > (quick) > "latest" source tree, either (better) "tagged" releases.
For regression testing I want to suggest this framework. It was written this Summer of Code. [1] for NetBSD, but it can be easily used in other projects.It is designed to run, compile regression tests from C, shell and report them in txt or XML file. XML can be easily converted to nice html page. [1]http://www.netbsd.org/~jmmv/atf/ Regards Adam. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
