On Mon, 7 Jan 2008, Kim Woelders wrote:
> I put that file there at a point where I got annoyed with the formatting
> style mess in imlib2. The formatting style details, among other things
> tabs/spaces, were set up in an attempt to minimize the overall change
> caused by running indent on src/lib/*.c at that time. IIRC using spaces
> in stead of tabs resulted in slightly fewer changes.
>
> Actually, I think the "original raster formatting style" is closer to
> the one in e16/e/.indent.pro, which specifies to use tabs.
>
> I think it would be a good thing to specify a recommended/default indent
> profile, and require that apps/libs explicitly place a .indent.pro at
> top level if they want to deviate.

about tabs vs spaces, I would prefer spaces. We all have different text 
editors, configured in some ways. Not mentionning all other people that do 
not develop on e and want to see the sources. That imply that a source 
code using tabs will look horrible to the reader if the text editor is not 
configured with the correct number of spaces for a tabulation.

other thoughts ?

Vincent

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to