Vincent Torri wrote: > > On Mon, 7 Jan 2008, Kim Woelders wrote: >> I put that file there at a point where I got annoyed with the formatting >> style mess in imlib2. The formatting style details, among other things >> tabs/spaces, were set up in an attempt to minimize the overall change >> caused by running indent on src/lib/*.c at that time. IIRC using spaces >> in stead of tabs resulted in slightly fewer changes. >> >> Actually, I think the "original raster formatting style" is closer to >> the one in e16/e/.indent.pro, which specifies to use tabs. >> >> I think it would be a good thing to specify a recommended/default indent >> profile, and require that apps/libs explicitly place a .indent.pro at >> top level if they want to deviate. > > about tabs vs spaces, I would prefer spaces. We all have different text > editors, configured in some ways. Not mentionning all other people that do > not develop on e and want to see the sources. That imply that a source > code using tabs will look horrible to the reader if the text editor is not > configured with the correct number of spaces for a tabulation. > > other thoughts ? > I prefer spaces too, although I don't care much one way or the other, as long as the rules are clear (and the line length is set to 80 of course :) ).
/Kim ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
