Hello. On Tue, 2008-02-05 at 00:38, Jerome Pinot wrote: > > > What do you think about these 2 projects ? Continue working on exalt is > > a good idea or a waste of time ? > > Short answer: keep going with exalt > > Long answer: > - e_nm and exalt don't provide the same features.
Indeed. > - on my box, exalt is working well, but Networkmanager is not. Ouch, that should get fixed. ;) > - Networkmanager is not standardized yet and comes from gtk2/gnome > world. Do we really need this dependency ? As I plan to only use the backend this reduces to glib. Even if this dep is not nice for efl it still is totally optional. > - We like efl, coding on efl. No ? What do you mean here? The plan is to have an evas/edje frontend that uses e_nm for the dbus communication via dbus. > - We already have ewl/etk, weather/forecast, bling/blang/ecomorph, > etc: don't worry about similar features. Yeah, choice. > But most important, don't forget the fun and do something you like! Indeed the most important point. regards Stefan Schmidt
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
