On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 10:17 AM, Santiago Aguiar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I changed the patch to reflect Gustavo's comments. > > I left the part table lookup to keep the compile time check (besides > most embryo wrapper functions do something similar). Would it be ok to > add a GROUP:"name" construct to edc?
Now it looks perfect :-) If nobody else spot problems I'll commit later today. As for GROUP:"name" it would be great and could help in the case of "type: GROUP", but I fear most for compile time checks, as converting them to numbers/integers will not help much. -- Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri http://profusion.mobi Embedded Systems -------------------------------------- MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Skype: gsbarbieri Mobile: +55 (81) 9927 0010 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
