Gustavo wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 10:17 AM, Santiago Aguiar
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I changed the patch to reflect Gustavo's comments.
>>
>> I left the part table lookup to keep the compile time check (besides
>> most embryo wrapper functions do something similar). Would it be ok to
>> add a GROUP:"name" construct to edc?
>>
>
> Now it looks perfect :-) If nobody else spot problems I'll commit later today.
>
> As for GROUP:"name" it would be great and could help in the case of
> "type: GROUP", but I fear most for compile time checks, as converting
> them to numbers/integers will not help much.
>
>
Extend embryo scripting to have a swallow function (even if it's
to be restricted to swallowing only other edje groups) seems like
a nice addition.. complements the internal edc GROUP part very well.
But what do you mean by: add a GROUP:"name" construct to edc?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
