On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 1:46 PM, Jose Gonzalez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Gustavo wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 10:17 AM, Santiago Aguiar > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> I changed the patch to reflect Gustavo's comments. > >> > >> I left the part table lookup to keep the compile time check (besides > >> most embryo wrapper functions do something similar). Would it be ok to > >> add a GROUP:"name" construct to edc? > >> > > > > Now it looks perfect :-) If nobody else spot problems I'll commit later > today. > > > > As for GROUP:"name" it would be great and could help in the case of > > "type: GROUP", but I fear most for compile time checks, as converting > > them to numbers/integers will not help much. > > > > > Extend embryo scripting to have a swallow function (even if it's > to be restricted to swallowing only other edje groups) seems like > a nice addition.. complements the internal edc GROUP part very well. > But what do you mean by: add a GROUP:"name" construct to edc?
That would validate if the "name" is a group of that file, as it does for PART:"name", but unlike part-variant it would not translate it to an integer. I don't know the internals to say if it's easy or not, very useful or not... -- Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri http://profusion.mobi Embedded Systems -------------------------------------- MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Skype: gsbarbieri Mobile: +55 (81) 9927 0010 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
