On Monday, 16 June 2008, at 15:33:23 (+0200), Cedric BAIL wrote: > On this topic, I believe we have two choice, libtomcrypt > (http://libtom.org/?page=features&newsitems=5&whatfile=crypt) and > openssl. My opinion on this subject is certainly biased as I already > use libtomcrypt, but it's a small, simple and easy to port library. I > believe we should make this dependency optional (if eet is compiled > without crypto support all function call requiring it will just > cleanly fail). > > So guys, what's your opinion on this subject ?
You forgot "beecrypt," which would also be a worthy option. But since openssl is part of the core OS of pretty much every distro, it would be the clear choice IMHO. Michael -- Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX) http://www.kainx.org/ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Linux Server/Cluster Admin, LBL.gov Author, Eterm (www.eterm.org) ----------------------------------------------------------------------- "What does not destroy me, makes me stronger." -- Nietzsche, The Twilight of the Idols (1888) ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
