Michael Jennings wrote: > On Monday, 16 June 2008, at 15:33:23 (+0200), > Cedric BAIL wrote: > >> On this topic, I believe we have two choice, libtomcrypt >> (http://libtom.org/?page=features&newsitems=5&whatfile=crypt) and >> openssl. My opinion on this subject is certainly biased as I already >> use libtomcrypt, but it's a small, simple and easy to port library. I >> believe we should make this dependency optional (if eet is compiled >> without crypto support all function call requiring it will just >> cleanly fail). >> >> So guys, what's your opinion on this subject ? > > You forgot "beecrypt," which would also be a worthy option. But since > openssl is part of the core OS of pretty much every distro, it would > be the clear choice IMHO. >
Not to mention the fact that Ecore already has OpenSSL as a optional dependency. Would be strange to use multiple crypto libs. dan ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
