On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 8:01 AM, Vincent Torri <vto...@univ-evry.fr> wrote: > > Hey, > > I think that, before the release, we should verify that the api is consistent. > > I think that, at least, we must verify that: > > 1) if a function has a _add sufix, the invert function must have the _del > sufix > > 2) if a function has a _new sufix, the invert function must have the _free > sufix. > > I have seen that, in all the graphic systems of ecore, we create a window with > _new, but we destroy it with _del, which is not consistent with the other > parts > of evas / ecore.
ok, evas_free is there, all ecore is del, maybe rename free->del in evas and have all destructors/deleters to be _del? I will not say the same for _add/_new since they are different things/concepts, although I'd not bother if rename _add->_new happens. > Do you think that we should (must ?) rename these _del functions to _free ? I'd not change it at this point, but if you feel like doing so, not against. -- Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri http://profusion.mobi embedded systems -------------------------------------- MSN: barbi...@gmail.com Skype: gsbarbieri Mobile: +55 (19) 9225-2202 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
