On Wed, 1 Apr 2009 12:54:13 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri <[email protected]> said:
> On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 9:18 AM, Vincent Torri <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, 1 Apr 2009, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: > > > >> ok, evas_free is there, all ecore is del, maybe rename free->del in > >> evas and have all destructors/deleters to be _del? I will not say the > >> same for _add/_new since they are different things/concepts, although > >> I'd not bother if rename _add->_new happens. > > > > so, having always _del for the invert function of _add or _new ? That's > > simple enough for the user. It's fine for me. > > yes, and I like del more than destroy as pfritz says, it's shorter after all! i agree add + del and new + free. they go together and shouldn't be mixed. -- ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
