Hi,

Most (if not all) rpm specs define the following:

Release: 0.%(date '+%Y%m%d')

I propose to change this to:

Release: 0.%(date '+%Y%m%d%H%M')

The reasoning is:
 * I like to install in rpms compiled from trunk
 * rpms provide a nice and cleaner build environment with dep management
 * if one is working on a library and installing it frequently, just
%Y%m%d isn't enough

Since I have done this on some specs, unless anyone strongly opposes
this change, I plan to do it during easter. Nothing should break, but
this heads-up should be particularly important to someone with a build
host, or something, which is rpm based.

What do you think?

Rui

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to