On 09/15/2010 06:49 AM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 21:18:58 +0900 Mike McCormack<mj.mccorm...@samsung.com> > said: > > >> On 09/13/2010 08:46 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: >> >>> Yeah... that's the kind of problem I said in the other mail thread >>> that got disturbed by stupid GIT discussions :-/ See guys, not even >>> GIT would help here :-/ >>> >> The problem here isn't the revision control system, it's that >> there's no systematic code review before code goes into SVN. >> > if you want development to work at 1/4 the speed it does... then just keep > suggesting that. :) >
I don't really buy that argument, because breaks keep developers away and slow down development anyway, but it's your project... > review doesn't just magically catch all bugs. It magically catches 80% of bugs, which is a good start. How about having patches at least verified by a buildbot before they're commited? thanks, Mike ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances and start using them to simplify application deployment and accelerate your shift to cloud computing. http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
