On 09/15/2010 01:50 PM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > but i do agree with the "small patches". i disagree with needing to go into a > patch queue and be reviewed. i think we can handle this given our current > infra > with svn commits list - the commits though need to be small and digestible.
The "drive by" commit issue is similar to the "small patch" & "lack of code review" issues. There wouldn't be any "drive by" commits if code review was enforced. > as such e3 and e4 (our 2 new french servers) are intended to become build and > test machines - they literally will rebuild large chunks of svn and create > reports etc. they are not ready yet. being worked on. Sounds great! > i suspect there definitely are :) Like which one? :-) thanks, Mike ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances and start using them to simplify application deployment and accelerate your shift to cloud computing. http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
