some years ago, i made route application using local map data.
at that time, dijkstra's algorithm was a perfect solution.
now I'm downloading 'asia.osm.bz2'. it is 2.3 Gbytes..
the size is reasonable for recent mobile external memory.

i'm gonna make sample route program and test on my n900. :)
there are some open sources for that, but i do make it from scratch.
okay.. as everybody said. local feature is needed.

i'll focus my brain to that feature for the time being..

Thanks.


> Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2011 11:33:51 +0900
> From: Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) <ras...@rasterman.com>
> Subject: Re: [E-devel] splitting elm_map into a new library
> To: David Seikel <onef...@gmail.com>
> Cc: enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Message-ID: <20110430113351.427703e5.ras...@rasterman.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
>
> On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 08:56:11 +1000 David Seikel <onef...@gmail.com> said:
>
> > On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 02:12:49 +0900 sangho park <gouach...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > as basic concept, route information can be acquired by service, not
> > > local data.
> > > we can extend route for shortest path using local backing store, but
> > > it's just option.
> > > yes..yes.. it'll be very good feature that uses local map and route
> > > data, but we should overcome so many license issues.
> >
> > Personally I think it's absolutely critical to be able to do local
> > routing.  That's my main use case, navigating out in the wild when I
> > have no data connection.  "Semi manual" routing is OK, that's even
> > a desired feature.  Pick out a few waypoints, draw some route
> > segments, tell it to follow this road or river from waypoint C to
> > waypoint D, but keep the A to B to C and D to E segments...
> >
> > Perhaps, if we have to, precalculate route segments when there is a data
> > connection, store them; then manipulate them later, adding or removing
> > them to a particular route.
> >
> > /me does not want to be stuck out in the middle of nowhere with no
> > routing ability.
>
> to me this all seems like it would be best done as client-server locally
> too.
> unlike remote map server, it has 1 shortcut - you don't DOWNLOAD map tiles.
> you
> are directly pointed to the file. this way routing can be offloaded to the
> local mapserver (and calculating a route can take a long time, and need a
> lot
> of route data, so this makes sense). all the abstraction needs is the short
> cut
> ability for tiles.
>
> someone still then has to write that local server and routing engine :) do
> you
> want to? :) (a local tile server would be trivial, but routing... that's
> another matter as technically it may not be that hard as its just solving a
> graph, the problem is having the right graph data with the right weighting,
> and
> then a whole tonne of "fuzzy logic" thrown in to cover up "odd solutions"
> that
> may come out of the graph that a human would never make).
>
> --
> ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" --------------
> The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler)    ras...@rasterman.com
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WhatsUp Gold - Download Free Network Management Software
The most intuitive, comprehensive, and cost-effective network 
management toolset available today.  Delivers lowest initial 
acquisition cost and overall TCO of any competing solution.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/whatsupgold-sd
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to