On Wed, 9 Nov 2011 14:28:50 -0200 Rafael Antognolli
<antogno...@profusion.mobi> wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Tom Hacohen
> <tom.haco...@partner.samsung.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 09/11/11 16:16, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
> > > I'm fairly certain that his objection is not to the API or
> > > features it introduces, but for the timetable and lack of PUBLIC
> > > review for such a huge patch. You continue to claim that "it's
> > > tiny" and "it only affects you if you are using the features it
> > > introduces". Both of these are false claims which have been
> > > disproved by me and others. We have less than two weeks until the
> > > 1.1 release. Prior to this addition, EFL and Edje were considered
> > > by everyone in the community be stable and in good shape. This is
> > > no longer the case, and I'm sure there are many others aside from
> > > Vincent who would agree with this sentiment.
> > >
> >
> > I concur.
> 
> Agreed.
> 
> > > I vote that the sound API and all related commits be reverted
> > > immediately and pushed off until after 1.1. Regardless of your
> > > expertise on sound implementations and how solid you may claim it
> > > to be, this feature CANNOT be tested sufficiently to meet EFL
> > > quality standards before the release. That alone should be enough
> > > to have ensured that it was never committed in the first place,
> > > other breakages notwithstanding.
> > >
> >
> > No idea what needs to be done about it, but the current situation is
> > indeed problematic.
> 
> I think that Gustavo's idea of releasing Edje again soon after this
> release, just to include this sound API, would solve the problem,
> right? What would be a good reason for not doing that?
> 
> We already have a different version for eet, keeping that for edje too
> shouldn't be much pain...

That would certainly give me a chance to include the sound stuff in the
lua edje API and have it out soon.

On the other hand, that don't do my current project any good, it's just
more complex code when all I need is to squirt a .wav at /dev/dsp.  A
problem I have solved already.

Still would be neat for other things.  B-)

-- 
A big old stinking pile of genius that no one wants
coz there are too many silver coated monkeys in the world.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RSA(R) Conference 2012
Save $700 by Nov 18
Register now
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to