2011/12/20 Tom Hacohen <tom.haco...@partner.samsung.com>:
> On 20/12/11 12:27, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>> agreed. programmer should simply try and use pinch gestures and if he doesnt
>> get any either its not possible (no multi-touch device) or, no emulated
>> gesture/input is being used (he really is looking at zoom not pinch so you 
>> can
>> emulate with mousehweels etc. or other actions like "double tap" and so on).
>> the programmer shouldn't decide by system configuration decides - if someone
>> wishes to violate the patent by turning it on, they can, but otherwise it's 
>> off
>> by default. in theory we maybe should also shoudl be able to compile out the
>> code to handle the bevhavior which at the app level will result in the same
>> thing as it being off in config - it just can never be turned on without a
>> recompile (freetype did this with bytecode hinting for many years).
>
> Yep, freetype is the same example I had in mind.
>

Thank you for your comments. :)
Besides, I have a question.
I know that bytecode interpreter was patented previously and It was
disabled at compile time in Freetype.
If so, bytecode interpreter was not included in released Freetype binary???
But elm_gesutre is built in when elementary binary is released and it
can be disabled at runtime time.

Does this have no problems?? Anyway, I hate damn patent :-(.

-- 
BRs,
Kim.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Write once. Port to many.
Get the SDK and tools to simplify cross-platform app development. Create 
new or port existing apps to sell to consumers worldwide. Explore the 
Intel AppUpSM program developer opportunity. appdeveloper.intel.com/join
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-appdev
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to