On Mon, 10 Sep 2012 16:43:44 -0300 Leandro Pereira <lean...@profusion.mobi> wrote:
> Luis, > > On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 8:40 AM, Luis Felipe Strano Moraes > <luis.str...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Honestly, given the amount of people working on Phabricator, I would > > much rather go forward with it (if it does indeed cover everything > > that is needed in our case, which seems to be the case). InDefero > > looked like it had much less frequent commits, and from the link > > above it seems it is no longer the priority for the main author. > > After using Phabricator for some weeks, I feel it is pretty stable and > easy to use. While it encourages a clean and organized workflow it > does not enforce it, which might ease the adoption process or create a > mess if people is not careful enough. Nice review. After the complete balls up that Trac was, I have one question - is account creation simple, reliable, and actually works? I can't use the E Trac, coz it completely fucked up my account at creation time. Got errors, and even after manual intervention by admins, it still wont let me actually use it. -- A big old stinking pile of genius that no one wants coz there are too many silver coated monkeys in the world.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
