On Wednesday, November 21, 2012, Thomas Sachau wrote: > Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri schrieb: > > On Wednesday, November 21, 2012, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > > > >> On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 13:54:14 +0000 Michael Blumenkrantz > >> <michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com <javascript:;> <javascript:;>> said: > >> > >>> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 1:47 PM, Carsten Haitzler < > ras...@rasterman.com <javascript:;><javascript:;> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 13:18:41 +0000 Michael Blumenkrantz > >>>> <michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com <javascript:;> <javascript:;>> said: > >>>> > >>>>> ah, how quickly bets are made against me the instant I leave the > >> country. > >>>>> my league of admirers is always so reliable! > >>>>> > >>>>> distcheck is always run before a release. always. > >>>> > >>>> then how did it pass when the edje_cc in the 1.7 branch literally did > >>>> crash in > >>>> this scenario - it wasnt random. it literally was ALWAYS a strcmp > >> against > >>>> NULL... > >>>> > >>>>> I said previously that I run the stable branch at work; I'm not at > >> work. > >>>> > >>>> aaaah so you didn't distcheck this one against stable branch? > >>>> > >>> > >>> I'm on vacation, bedridden most of the time with the German Plague and > a > >>> fever so high that the top of it can't be seen from the peak of Mt. > >>> Everest. Despite this, I managed to drag myself to my computer to try > and > >>> do a release. > >>> > >>> I would appreciate greatly if people could stop being less negative and > >>> critical, and instead focus more on being both productive and > >> constructive. > >> > >> fair enough - i just never expected this should even get through if you > are > >> building/testing against 1.7 - since you are not right now that dos > create > >> some > >> issues and changes expectations that you are testing against that. :) > > > > > > > > How about you, Raster? Are you able to test with 1.7.x? You've mentioned > > this edje_cc bug and the Evas leaks. Anything else that is know but > pending > > to be debugged in EFL (leaks, crashes) or we can do a 1.7.2? > > If doing a full release cycle for all released libs is too much work, > what about just a minor release for edje (like version 1.7.1.1), so that > users can again use release tarballs to build alpha4 of e17?
Seems reasonable. But I guess there are other stuff in other libs to be out. They just wanted to get it closer to e17 being out. I'd say we need the libs should be out before e17, then we can make sure it works. Then the only situation to avoid releasing EFL is if there is something pending fix (leaks, crashes) that must get done before such release. > > > -- > > Thomas Sachau > Gentoo Linux Developer > > -- Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri http://profusion.mobi embedded systems -------------------------------------- MSN: barbi...@gmail.com Skype: gsbarbieri Mobile: +55 (19) 9225-2202 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware, SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial. Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications! http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
